<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Why Indian firms missed “obvious” risks in 2025: a boardroom blind spot]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Mint’s Company Outsider column states that many Indian firms were blindsided by risks that were hiding in plain sight. Four patterns stood out:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p dir="auto">Treating rule changes as “paperwork,” not capacity shocks. Airlines planned winter schedules without fully modelling the new pilot duty/rest rules—then scrambled as rosters broke and flights were cancelled, forcing pay resets and temporary relaxations. Lesson: build regulatory stress-tests into ops, not PR plans.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p dir="auto">Single-point supply chains that everyone knew were brittle. China’s curbs on rare-earth magnets exposed EV/auto dependencies; even after 2024–25 warnings, many buyers lacked alternates or buffers. India’s late push to stand up domestic magnet capacity is a start, but firms need dual tech/vendor pathways and recycling pipelines.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p dir="auto">ESG as slides, not systems. Companies over-indexed on claims while under-investing in product-level traceability and compliance ops—leaving them vulnerable when regulators and platforms tightened scrutiny. (The column’s broader point: governance must fund “measurement plumbing,” not just messaging.)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p dir="auto">Succession and key-person risk underplayed. Several promoter-led firms drifted on execution because boards didn’t force hard timelines and contingency drills, the piece notes.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto"><strong>Playbook for 2026 (implied by the column + recent events):</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>
<p dir="auto">Put regulatory stresses (duty-time, safety, tax, data) into quarterly scenario runs; pre-commit capacity/crew buffers and trigger thresholds.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p dir="auto">Build second sources for critical inputs; for magnets/semis, align with India’s localisation schemes but also lock friend-shored contracts to bridge the gap.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p dir="auto">Shift ESG from deck to data: SKU-level emissions/traceability and audit trails that survive platform or regulator checks.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p dir="auto">Treat succession like cyber: run table-top drills, publish timelines, and tie leadership KPIs to risk anticipation, not only crisis response.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto"><strong>Net message:</strong> Indian companies excel at firefighting; 2026 will reward those that budget for foresight and redundancy before the spark.</p>
<p dir="auto">[Visit LiveMint](<a href="https://www.livemin" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.livemin</a>[link removed]m/newsletters/company-outsider-from-regulations-to-supply-chains-why-indian-companies-missed-obvious-threats-in-2025-11766998639057.html)</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.javis.ai/topic/137/why-indian-firms-missed-obvious-risks-in-2025-a-boardroom-blind-spot</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 19:49:47 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.javis.ai/topic/137.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 08:54:12 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>